Prompt injection & jailbreaks
Direct and indirect injection through user input, documents, web pages, emails and tool results — including multi-turn and encoded payloads that bypass guardrails.
VEXTRACE red-teams large language models, RAG pipelines and autonomous AI agents the way real adversaries attack them — prompt injection, jailbreaks, data exfiltration and tool abuse — and hands your engineers a prioritized, reproducible remediation plan mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, MITRE ATLAS and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.
Every surface where a model reads untrusted input, touches data or takes an action.
Direct and indirect injection through user input, documents, web pages, emails and tool results — including multi-turn and encoded payloads that bypass guardrails.
Extraction of system prompts, secrets, PII and proprietary context from chat surfaces, logs and retrieval layers.
Knowledge-base poisoning, embedding manipulation, access-control bypass across tenants and context-filter evasion.
Excessive agency, privilege escalation through tools and APIs, unsafe code execution and multi-agent chains (LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI, MCP servers).
Model output that reaches browsers, shells, SQL or downstream systems without validation — XSS, SSRF and command injection via the model.
Hallucination under adversarial pressure, harmful-content bypass, denial-of-wallet and unbounded consumption.
Human-led adversarial testing, accelerated by our own automation — never a scanner report with a logo on it.
Findings translate directly into the language your auditors, regulators and engineers already use.
| Framework | How it is used |
|---|---|
| OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025) | Coverage checklist and finding taxonomy (LLM01–LLM10). |
| MITRE ATLAS | Adversary tactics and techniques against AI systems, used to build attack paths. |
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 & Generative AI Profile (AI 600-1) | Risk language for executive reporting and governance programs. |
| EU AI Act · ISO/IEC 42001 | Evidence of adversarial testing for high-risk and general-purpose AI obligations. |
What security and AI teams ask before an engagement.
AI red teaming is adversarial testing of an AI system: specialists attack the model, its data and the tools it can use — the way a real attacker would — to find failures such as prompt injection, data leakage or unsafe actions before they reach production.
A classic pentest targets code and infrastructure. LLM applications fail in new ways: the "input" is natural language, behaviour is probabilistic and an agent can act on your systems. We test both layers — the AI behaviour and the application and infrastructure around it.
Commercial APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral and others), open-weight models you host yourself, RAG stacks built on common vector databases, and agent frameworks including MCP-based tool integrations.
A focused assessment of one LLM feature usually takes one to two weeks; a full program covering several agents, data sources and integrations typically runs three to six weeks, including retest.
No. Most engagements are black- or grey-box against your deployed application. Access to system prompts, architecture diagrams and tool permissions makes testing deeper and faster, and is handled under NDA and our data-handling policy.
Tell us what the model can see and do. We return a scoped AI red-team plan within 48 hours.